Situation, Education, Innovation, and Recommendation: A Large-Scale Systematic Review of Advance Care Planning in the Age of COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for advance care planning (ACP) as a way to help mitigate the various care concerns that accompanied the healthcare crisis. However, unique obstacles to typical ACP practice necessitated the need for guidance and innovation to help facilitate these vital conversations. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the various ACP barriers and facilitators that arose during the pandemic and determine how ACP practice was affected across different contexts and among different populations. This systematic review (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022359092), which adheres to the PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews, examined studies on ACP in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The review involved searches of five databases, including MEDLINE and Embase. Of the 843 identified studies, 115 met the inclusion criteria. The extracted ACP barriers and facilitators were codified and quantified. The most frequently occurring ACP barrier codes were: Social distancing measures and visitation restrictions, Uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 prognosis, and Technological/Telehealth barriers. The most frequently occurring ACP facilitator codes were the following: Telehealth/virtual ACP platforms, Training for clinicians, and Care team collaboration. Identifying the ACP barriers and facilitators is essential for developing effective, resilient ACP promotion strategies and improving its delivery, accessibility, and acceptability.

Barriers to and facilitators of advance care planning implementation for medical staff after the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview of reviews.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the capacity for advance care planning (ACP) among patients, families and healthcare teams. We sought to identify and review the barriers to and facilitators of ACP implementation for medical staff in different settings (eg, hospitals, outpatient palliative care, nursing and care homes) during the pandemic. DESIGN: This study employed an overview of reviews design. We searched the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science and Embase databases for studies published between 8 December 2019 and 30 July 2023. We used AMSTAR 2 to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: We included seven reviews. Common barriers to ACP implementation included visitation restrictions, limited resources and personnel and a lack of coordination among healthcare professionals. In care and nursing homes, barriers included a dearth of palliative care physicians and the psychological burden on facility staff. Using telemedicine for information sharing was a common facilitator across settings. In hospitals, facilitators included short-term training in palliative care and palliative care physicians joining the acute care team. In care and nursing homes, facilitators included ACP education and emotional support for staff. CONCLUSIONS: Visitation restrictions and limited resources during the pandemic posed obstacles; however, the implementation of ACP was further hindered by insufficient staff education on ACP in hospitals and facilities, as well as a scarcity of information sharing at the community level. These pre-existing issues were magnified by the pandemic, drawing attention to their significance. Short-term staff training programmes and immediate information sharing could better enable ACP. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022351362.

Association between physicians' characteristics and their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding advance care planning: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Despite physicians' vital role in advance care planning, a limited number of physicians practice it. This study assessed factors associated with physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding advance care planning. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from an anonymous survey conducted by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Questionnaires were mailed to 4500 physicians in November and December 2022. Data from 1260 respondents were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 46.4%, 77.0%, and 82.0% reported good knowledge of advance care planning, agreed with promoting it, and with its provision by medical/care staff, respectively. Male physicians were significantly less likely to support advance care planning (odds ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.84) or agree to its provision by medical/care staff (odds ratio: 0.47, 95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.78) but significantly more likely to practice it (odds ratio: 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-2.36). Physicians specialized in surgery or internal/general/palliative medicine were more knowledgeable about advance care planning and more likely to practice it. Physicians working in clinics were significantly less knowledgeable (odds ratio: 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.44) about advance care planning and less likely to support it (odds ratio: 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.50), agree with its provision by medical/care staff (odds ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.75), or to practice it (odds ratio: 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians working in clinics had less knowledge of advance care planning, less supportive attitudes, and less likely to practice it. Knowledge, attitudes and practice also varied by gender and specialty. Interventions should target physicians working in clinics.

Japanese Local Governments' Dissemination Activities for Advance Care Planning: A Descriptive Analysis of a Nationwide Survey during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

This study aims to compare the awareness-raising activities between municipalities with and without focused anti-infection measures during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Descriptive analysis was conducted using a nationwide self-administered questionnaire survey on municipalities' activities for residents and for healthcare providers and care workers (HCPs) in October 2022 in Japan. This study included 433 municipalities that had conducted awareness-raising activities before 2019 Fiscal Year. Workshops for residents were conducted in 85.2% of the municipalities, and they were more likely to be conducted in areas with focused anti-infection measures than those without measures (86.8% vs. 75.4%). Additionally, 85.9% of the municipalities were impacted by the pandemic; 50.1% canceled workshops, while 26.0% switched to a web-based style. Activities for HCPs were conducted in 55.2-63.7% of the municipalities, and they were more likely to be conducted in areas with focused anti-infection measures. A total of 50.6-62.1% of the municipalities changed their workshops for HCPs to a web-based style. Comparisons between areas with and without focused anti-infection measures indicated that the percentages of those impacted for all activities were not significantly different. In conclusion, awareness-raising activities in municipalities were conducted with new methods during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using information technology is essential to further promote such activities for residents.

Preferred Place of End-of-Life Care Based on Clinical Scenario: A Cross-Sectional Study of a General Japanese Population.

In Japan, which has an aging society with many deaths, it is important that people discuss preferred place for end-of-life care in advance. This study aims to investigate whether the preferred place of end-of-life care differs by the assumed clinical scenario. This clinical scenario-based survey used data from a nationwide survey conducted in Japan in December 2017. Participants aged 20 years and older were randomly selected from the general population. The survey contained questions based on three scenarios: cancer, end-stage heart disease, and dementia. For each scenario, respondents were asked to choose the preferred place of end-of-life care among three options: home, nursing home, and medical facility. Eight hundred eighty-nine individuals participated in this study (effective response rate: 14.8%). The proportions of respondents choosing home, nursing home, and medical facility for the cancer scenario were 49.6%, 10.9%, and 39.5%, respectively; for the end-stage heart disease scenario, 30.5%, 18.9%, and 50.6%; and for the dementia scenario, 15.2%, 54.5%, and 30.3% (p < 0.0001, chi-square test). The preferred place of end-of-life care differed by the assumed clinical scenario. In clinical practice, concrete information about diseases and their status should be provided during discussions about preferred place for end-of-life care to reveal people's preferences more accurately.

National trends in the proportion of in-hospital deaths by cause of death among older adults with long-term care: a nationwide observational study in Japan from 2007 to 2017.

BACKGROUND: Japan has promoted end-of-life care at home and in long-term care facilities, and the total proportion of in-hospital deaths has decreased recently. However, the difference in trends of in-hospital deaths by the cause of death remains unclear. We investigated the variation in trends of in-hospital deaths among older adults with long-term care from 2007 to 2017, by cause of death and place of care. METHODS: Using the national long-term care insurance registry, long-term care claims data, and national death records, we identified people aged 65 years or older who died between 2007 and 2017 and used long-term care services in the month before death. Using a joinpoint regression model, we evaluated time trends of the proportion of in-hospital deaths by cause of death (cancer, heart diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, pneumonia, and senility) and place of care (home, long-term care health facility, or long-term care welfare facility). RESULTS: Of the 3,261,839 participants, the mean age was 87.0 ± 8.0 years, and 59.2% were female. Overall, the proportion of in-hospital deaths decreased from 66.2% in 2007 to 55.3% in 2017. By cause of death, the proportion of in-hospital deaths remained the highest for pneumonia (81.6% in 2007 and 77.2% in 2017) and lowest for senility (25.5% in 2007 and 20.0% in 2017) in all types of places of care. The joinpoint regression analysis showed the steepest decline among those who died of senility, especially among long-term care health facility residents. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this nationwide study suggest that there was a decreasing trend of in-hospital deaths among older adults, although the speed of decline and absolute values varied widely depending on the cause of death and place of care.

Caregiving Experience and Other Factors Associated With Having End-Of-Life Discussions: A Cross-Sectional Study of a General Japanese Population.

CONTEXT: The factors associated with end-of-life discussion (EOLD) are not well elucidated; an understanding of these factors may help facilitate EOLD. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the associations between EOLD and experiences of the death of and/or care for a loved one and other factors. METHODS: Data from a nationwide anonymous questionnaire survey of public attitudes toward end-of-life medical care, conducted in December 2017 in Japan, were used. Participants were randomly selected from the general population (age ≥ 20 years), and respondents who completed the questionnaire were analyzed (respondents: n = 836; effective response rate: 13.9%). Respondents were divided into two groups based on their experience of EOLD: those who had engaged in EOLD and those who had not. The main predictors were the experiences of the death of and care for a loved one. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 836 respondents (male: 55.6%, aged 65 and over: 43.5%), 43.7% reported their engagement in EOLD. In the analyses, "having experience of caring for a loved one" was associated with EOLD compared with never having experience (odds ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.35-2.64). However, having experience of the death of a loved one had no association. CONCLUSION: For health-care providers, it may be worth recognizing that the care experience of their patient's caregiver might affect the caregiver's own EOLD in the future.

[Factors related to bereaved family's satisfaction with end-of-life care at geriatric health services facilities].

Objectives　In Japan, the proportion of older people receiving end-of-life care in geriatric health services facilities (GHSF) is increasing. However, to our knowledge, there have been no previous studies investigating the relationship between the structure of GHSFs and the quality of end-of-life care evaluated by bereaved families.Methods　We secondarily analyzed data from the survey done by the Japan Association of Geriatric Health Services Facilities (JAGHSF) in January 2014. Study subjects were 3 recently bereaved family members who had experienced planned end-of-life care at different facilities of the JAGHSF.The dependent variable was the bereaved family members' satisfaction with end-of-life care, which was obtained based on the best answer out of a 5 point scale for the question "Didn't you regret your family member's death immediately after he/she died?" The independent variables included schemes of explanation of patients' conditions at GHSF, management, and education of facilities and staff by doctors. We conducted a univariate analysis, followed by a multivariable logistic regression analysis.Results　For the final analysis, we included 363 bereaved family members, of which 250 (68.9%) were satisfied with the end-of-life care. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, family members' satisfaction was significantly associated with regular medical consultation by doctors for facility users (adjusted odds ratio 2.94, 95% CI 1.52-5.70), explanation about patients' conditions at the time of admission by facility staff other than doctors (2.07, 1.01-4.25), explanation about patients' conditions at the time of deterioration by facility staff other than doctors (3.12, 1.17-8.33), and stress management by doctors for facility staff (3.63, 1.84-7.16).Conclusions　Respect for the roles of the facility staff other than doctors, such as the participation of facility staff in explaining situations for facility users and family members and management of facility staff stress, may improve satisfaction with end-of-life care among bereaved family members. More attention is needed for these factors to improve the quality of end-of-life care in GHSFs.

End-of-life care preferences of the general public and recommendations of healthcare providers: a nationwide survey in Japan.

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of differences between the preferences of the general public and the recommendations of healthcare providers with regard to end-of-life (EOL) care may facilitate EOL discussion. METHODS: The aim of this study was to clarify differences between preferences of the general public and recommendations of healthcare providers with regard to treatment, EOL care, and life-sustaining treatment (LST) based on a hypothetical scenario involving a patient with advanced cancer. This study comprised exploratory post-hoc analyses of "The Survey of Public Attitude Towards Medical Care at the End of life", which was a population based, cross-sectional anonymous survey in Japan to investigate public attitudes toward medical care at the end of life. Persons living in Japan over 20 years old were randomly selected nationwide. Physicians, nurses, and care staff were recruited at randomly selected facilities throughout Japan. The general public data from the original study was combined to the data of healthcare providers in order to conduct exploratory post-hoc analyses. The preferences of the general public and recommendations of healthcare providers with regard to EOL care and LST was assessed based on the hypothetical scenario of an advanced cancer patient. RESULTS: All returned questionnaires were analyzed: 973 from the general public, 1039 from physicians, 1854 from nurses, and 752 from care staff (response rates of 16.2, 23.1, 30.9, and 37.6%, respectively). The proportion of the general public who wanted "chemotherapy or radiation", "ventilation", and "cardiopulmonary resuscitation" was significantly higher than the frequency of these options being recommended by physicians, nurses, and care staff, but the general public preference for "cardiopulmonary resuscitation" was significantly lower than the frequency of its recommendation by care staff. CONCLUSION: Regarding a hypothetical scenario for advanced cancer, the general public preferred more aggressive treatment and more frequent LST than that recommended by healthcare providers.

Attitudes and Other Factors Influencing End-of-Life Discussion by Physicians, Nurses, and Care Staff: A Nationwide Survey in Japan.

CONTEXT: Better understanding about the attitudes of health-care providers toward end-of-life discussion would facilitate the development of systematic strategies for improving end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE: To clarify attitudes toward end-of-life discussion with patients near death and explore the factors influencing these attitudes among physicians, nurses, and care staff. METHODS: This study was part of a nationwide cross-sectional anonymous survey of the public attitudes toward end-of-life medical care performed in December 2017. The participants were physicians, nurses, and care staff from randomly selected facilities, including hospitals, clinics, home-visit nursing offices, nursing homes, and long-term care facilities throughout Japan. The questionnaire was sent to 4500 physicians, 6000 nurses, and 2000 care staff. We assessed attitudes about end-of-life discussion with patients near death, identification of the proxy decision maker, and sharing documented information on end-of-life discussion with the multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: We analyzed responses from 1012 physicians, 1824 nurses, and 749 care staff. The number of responders who considered they had adequate end-of-life discussion with patients near death was 281 (27.8%), 324 (17.8%), and 139 (18.6%), respectively. Participation in a nationwide education program and caring for at least 1 dying patient per month were factors that showed a significant association with adequate end-of-life discussion and identification of the proxy decision maker. CONCLUSIONS: The percentages of physicians, nurses, and care staff involved in adequate end-of-life discussion with patients near death were not high. Participation in a structured education program might have a positive influence on end-of-life discussion with patients.

Current Engagement in Advance Care Planning in Japan and Its Associated Factors.

Using the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare national data on perspectives toward medical care at the end of life, this study examined the current status of engagement in advance care planning (ACP) activities among physicians and nurses in Japan and associated factors. Only 28.7% of physicians and 27.6% of nurses answered that they were engaging their patients/clients in ACP. Multinomial regression analysis revealed that more frequent involvement in caring for dying patients was associated with ACP engagement for both physicians and nurses. Increased years of clinical practice experience and working in a hospital were associated with decreased likelihood of nurses' ACP engagement. Completion of training designed to promote patient self-determination at the end of life was associated with both physicians' and nurses' ACP engagement. It is recommended that health care professionals be encouraged to complete such training to promote patients' autonomy through ACP.

[Clinicopathological features of endometrial carcinoma in tamoxifen- and toremifene-treated breast cancer patients].

OBJECTIVE: Estrogen is involved in the development of breast and endometrial cancers, and tamoxifen, an antiestrogen, is associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer. Recently, tamoxifen use is suggested to be associated with the development of aggressive endometrial tumors. We performed a retrospective study to clarify the effects of tamoxifen (TAM) and toremifene (TOR) on clinicopathological features of endometrial cancer subsequently developed in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Endometrial cancer patients diagnosed at our institution from 2000 through 2008 were studied. RESULTS: Of 194 patients with endometrial cancer, 18 (9.3%) developed breast cancer before endometrial cancer diagnosis. Mean age was 66 years, and the median time interval between breast and endometrial cancer diagnosis was 10 years (range, 1.5 -32 years). Nine patients developed aggressive tumors(serous, clear cell, small cell carcinoma, and carcinosarcoma), and the remaining nine developed endometrioid tumor. Patients with aggressive tumor had a lower 5-year disease-specific survival (0% vs 88%, p<0.01). Ten patients had used TAM and/or TOR, and six had not; aggressive tumors developed in six of 10 TAM/TOR users, and in one of six nonusers (p=0.15), and the 3-year disease-specific survival rate was not different between TAM/TOR users and nonusers (62% vs 53%, p=0.84). Time intervals from breast cancer and endometrial cancer diagnosis were 10-16 years for TAM users and 5-6 years for TOR users (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Tamoxifen/toremifene use for breast cancer did not affect the prognosis of subsequent endometrial cancer in our small study; however, further studies were warranted. The use of toremifene may be associated with a shorter interval from breast cancer to endometrial cancer diagnosis compared to tamoxifen.